Adresse
Infodoc : Réseau des bibliothèques et centres de documentation d'AgroParisTechFrance
contact
Array ( [TITRE] => <b>Type de document : </b> [TITRE_CLEAN] => Type de document [OPAC_SHOW] => 1 [TYPE] => list [AFF] => Tiré à part [ID] => 4 [NAME] => cp_typdoc [DATATYPE] => integer [VALUES] => Array ( [0] => 7 ) )
Titre : |
A comparison of four methods for measuring roots of field crops in three contrasting soils.
|
Est un extrait ou un tiré à part de : | |
Auteur(s) : |
M. Kücke, Auteur (et co-auteur)
H. Schmid, Auteur (et co-auteur) A. Spiess, Auteur (et co-auteur) |
Type de document : | Tiré à part |
Sujets : | Enracinement ; Extraction ; Plante céréalière ; Sol argileux ; Sol limoneux ; Biométrie ; Céréale ; Méthodologie ; Racine ; Développement biologique ; Sol |
Résumé : |
Rooting measurements have been made at different growth stages for sugar beets (1987) and for cereals (1988) on three different sites using four different root measurement techniques : (a) the core method where roots were extracted and root length is directly measured, (b) the core-break method where the visible roots were counted on the faces of a broken soil column, (c) the trench profile wall method where the number of visible roots were counted and the root length density was estimated on a profile wall, and (d) the monolith method where the roots were extracted fromù monoliths dug out from a profile wall. The calibration curves between the field methods and the extraction methods were not linear, and regression coefficients differed significantly between different sites, crops a[...] Rooting measurements have been made at different growth stages for sugar beets (1987) and for cereals (1988) on three different sites using four different root measurement techniques : (a) the core method where roots were extracted and root length is directly measured, (b) the core-break method where the visible roots were counted on the faces of a broken soil column, (c) the trench profile wall method where the number of visible roots were counted and the root length density was estimated on a profile wall, and (d) the monolith method where the roots were extracted fromù monoliths dug out from a profile wall. The calibration curves between the field methods and the extraction methods were not linear, and regression coefficients differed significantly between different sites, crops and between fields with different agronomic management, e.g. irrigation and liquid manure application. Differences between growth stages were comparably low compared with those found between locations. Root length densities obtained with the trench profile method were on average 10-fold lower in the sand brown earth, 6-fold lower in the vertisol and 4 times lower in the cambisol compared to date obtained with the core method. It is therefore concluded that the core-break method and the tench profile wall method deliver no reliable data for comparing rooting intensities between different soils and between different crops is they are not calibrated with an extraction method for each site and crop. |
Editeur(s) : | Amsterdam : Kluwer Academic Publishers |
Date de publication : | 1995 |
Format : | pp. 63-71 / graph., tabl., réf. |
Note(s) : |
Vol.172 n° 1 |
Langue(s) : | Anglais |
Lien vers la notice : | https://infodoc.agroparistech.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=149608 |
Exemplaires (1)
Localisation | Emplacement | Pôle | Section | Cote | Support | Disponibilité |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kourou | Archives | AgroParisTech-Kourou | UMR.2481 | Papier Périodique | Empruntable Disponible |