Adresse
Infodoc : Réseau des bibliothèques et centres de documentation d'AgroParisTechFrance
contact
Array ( [TITRE] => <b>Type de document : </b> [TITRE_CLEAN] => Type de document [OPAC_SHOW] => 1 [TYPE] => list [AFF] => Article [ID] => 4 [NAME] => cp_typdoc [DATATYPE] => integer [VALUES] => Array ( [0] => 8 ) )
Titre : |
Protecting forests and biodiversity: are investments in eco-friendly production activities the best way to protect endangered ecosystems and enhance rural livelihoods?. IN : International Conference on Rural livehoods, Forests and Biodiversity, Bonn, May 2003. Ed : Hubert de Foresta
|
in | Forests, trees and livelihoods , Vol. 15 n° 2, 01/04/2005 |
Auteur(s) : |
P.J. Ferraro
R.D. Simpson |
Type de document : | Article |
Sujets : | Biodiversité ; Ressources naturelles ; Conservation des ressources ; Forêt tropicale economie de la conservation ; paiement direct ; interventions indirectes |
Résumé : |
A debate as been raging in recent years among conservation practioners and advocates. What are the most effective mechanisms for preserving the imperiled forest habitats that shelter most of the world's terrestrial biodiversity? In the past few decades most money has been going into "indirect" interventions such as "Integrated Conservation and Development Programs". While no one could object to efforts to achieve such worthy goals, several authors suggest that more "direct" approaches - payments in exchange for conservation performance - would better achieve conservation objectives. We argue here that direct incentives might better achieve both conservation and development objectives. While the problems facing both conservation practitioners and development specialists are indeed daun[...] A debate as been raging in recent years among conservation practioners and advocates. What are the most effective mechanisms for preserving the imperiled forest habitats that shelter most of the world's terrestrial biodiversity? In the past few decades most money has been going into "indirect" interventions such as "Integrated Conservation and Development Programs". While no one could object to efforts to achieve such worthy goals, several authors suggest that more "direct" approaches - payments in exchange for conservation performance - would better achieve conservation objectives. We argue here that direct incentives might better achieve both conservation and development objectives. While the problems facing both conservation practitioners and development specialists are indeed daunting, we feel that the arguments for direct approaches are compelling both as conceptual propositions and as practical policy advice. |
Article en page(s) : | 167 - 181 |
Langue(s) : | Anglais |
Lien vers la notice : | https://infodoc.agroparistech.fr/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=133816 |
Exemplaires (1)
Localisation | Emplacement | Pôle | Section | Cote | Support | Disponibilité |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Montpellier | Périodiques Montpellier | Périodiques foret à la doc - Sudoc | Papier Périodique | Empruntable Disponible |